Gastao Elias vs Nerman Fatic — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Elias G.
6-2 6-2
Fatic N.
Elias G.
662
Fatic N.
220

Gastao Elias defeated Nerman Fatic 6-2 6-2 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Elias G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Elias G.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Elias G.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
24
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
63
Break points won·Clear edge
24
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Elias G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1425
Surface ELO
5.7+54 Clay Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1447
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
3.7
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[2]
Hassan B.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ramos A.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Hemery C.
6-46-3
Agamenone F.
Bonadio R.
7-657-5
Hassan B.
Roca Batalla O.
7-616-4
Ramos A.[1]
Sousa J.
6-46-2
R16
Ramos A.[1]
Elias G.
7-676-4
Hassan B.
Gakhov I.[5]
7-56-1
Roca Batalla O.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-47-62
Cobolli F.[2]
Krutykh O.
7-626-3
Hemery C.
Bailly G.
7-56-746-1
Sousa J.
Sousa P.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Mikrut L.
7-646-3
Bonadio R.
Lavagno E.
3-66-36-2
R32
Cobolli F.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-45-76-0
Lavagno E.
Valkusz M.
3-67-640-0
Hassan B.
Forti F.
3-66-16-3
Agamenone F.
Gigante M.
6-47-64
Bailly G.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-3
Sousa P.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-4
Sousa J.
Rocha H.
6-27-5
Krutykh O.
Campana Lee G.
5-76-26-3
Bonadio R.
Skatov T.[3]
6-46-3
Roca Batalla O.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Fatic N.
6-26-2
Mikrut L.
Travaglia S.
1-66-27-61
Hemery C.
Weis A.
6-16-3
Ramos A.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-43-66-2
Gakhov I.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2