Lukas Klein vs Daniel Cox — Alicante CH Round of 32

Alicante CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
GBR
Daniel Cox
35 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLWWW
Klein L.
6-3 6-2
Cox D.
Klein L.
662
Cox D.
320

Lukas Klein defeated Daniel Cox 6-3 6-2 in the Alicante CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Lukas Klein came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Klein L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cox D.

Cox D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Klein L.Cox D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Klein L.Cox D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
39
30
Break points saved·Dominant
92
52
Break points won·Dominant
1
27
Deciding sets·Even
63
67
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
31
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Klein L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cox D.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[1]
Grenier H.
6-7106-26-4
Semi-finals
Grenier H.
Novak D.
4-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Marterer M.[6]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Novak D.
Ymer E.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Harris B.
6-36-4
Marterer M.[6]
Damm M.
7-57-5
Lestienne C.[1]
Landaluce M.
6-37-65
R16
Ymer E.
Bellucci M.[8]
3-67-656-3
Harris B.
Martinez P.[3]
6-16-2
Marterer M.[6]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Damm M.
Paire B.[4]
6-26-3
Landaluce M.
Cazaux A.[5]
4-66-26-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Nava E.
6-16-1
Novak D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-67
Grenier H.
Echargui M.
6-46-4
R32
Bellucci M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-47-5
Novak D.
Molcan A.[2]
6-16-3
Harris B.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-756-1
Marterer M.[6]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Landaluce M.
Maestrelli F.
6-44-66-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Blanch D.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Andreev A.
4-66-16-4
Martinez P.[3]
Carreno Busta P.
6-37-5
Grenier H.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-3
Echargui M.
Tirante T.[7]
6-46-4
Damm M.
Barroso Campos A.
6-47-65
Paire B.[4]
Cukierman D.
6-46-1
Nava E.
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gaio F.
6-17-5
Klein L.
Cox D.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-1