Nishesh Basavareddy vs Tennys Sandgren — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Nishesh Basavareddy
#142ATP
1722ELO
1681Hard ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
USA8
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Basavareddy N.
6-2 3-1
Sandgren T.
Basavareddy N.
63–
Sandgren T.
21–

Nishesh Basavareddy advanced when Tennys Sandgren retired 6-2 3-1 in the Tiburon CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basavareddy N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Basavareddy N.Sandgren T.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Basavareddy N.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
9.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (162 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basavareddy N.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
36
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Dominant
49
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basavareddy N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[3]
Walton A.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-4
Walton A.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[5]
Ritschard A.
6-36-767-5
Walton A.
Tomic B.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-46-2
Svajda Z.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-06-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-23-1
Walton A.
Tien L.
6-26-4
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
7-616-3
Schoolkate T.
Peniston R.[7]
6-36-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Michelsen A.[1]
4-66-46-3
Ritschard A.
Monday J.
6-36-757-62
Galarneau A.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-651-67-5
Svajda Z.[3]
Johnson S.
3-66-36-4
R32
Svajda Z.[3]
Harrison C.
7-667-5
Basavareddy N.
Shelbayh A.
6-04-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Tien L.
Johns G.
6-26-4
Lajal M.
Perez A.
6-16-3
Dougaz A.
Poljicak M.
7-636-4
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[4]
6-14-67-612
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-27-5
Galarneau A.[5]
Kypson P.
7-656-4
Peniston R.[7]
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Schoolkate T.
Baris O.
6-36-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-646-3
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-47-65
Monday J.
Lokoli L.
7-636-2
Johnson S.
Dostanic S.
7-633-66-2
Michelsen A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-726-36-4