Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Skander Mansouri — Charleston CH Qualifying Round 2

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA10
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
TUN1
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Kwiatkowski T.
3-6 6-2 7-5
Mansouri S.
Kwiatkowski T.
3672
Mansouri S.
6251

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Skander Mansouri 3-6 6-2 7-5 in the Charleston CH qualifying round 2 on hard. Thai Son Kwiatkowski extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-19Winston-SalemQ1hardThai Son Kwiatkowski7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Mansouri S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Serve advantage — Kwiatkowski T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Mansouri S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Mansouri S.
Clutch Rating·Even
5
2
Break points saved·Even
65
62
Break points won·Even
6
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
1
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mansouri S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Escobedo E.[4]
Rodenas P.
4-66-16-3
Kirchheimer S.[6]
Moller E.[7]
6-16-3
Holmgren A.[8]
Gomez F.[5]
6-07-5
Dostanic S.
Kozlov S.[11]
6-26-1
Mayo A.[9]
King D.
6-26-4
Kwiatkowski T.[10]
Mansouri S.[1]
3-66-27-5
Q1
Mayo A.[9]
Dlimi Y.
6-13-67-65
Kozlov S.[11]
Zheng M.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.[4]
Boulais J.
7-666-3
Mansouri S.[1]
Sinha A.
7-56-717-67
Rodenas P.
Ponwith N.[12]
6-756-17-65
Moller E.[7]
Vasa E.
7-56-746-4
Holmgren A.[8]
Schnur B.
6-787-57-65
Dostanic S.
Zhu E.[3]
4-67-56-0
King D.
Langmo C.[2]
4-67-657-63
Kwiatkowski T.[10]
Young D.
6-46-4