Brandon Holt vs Vasek Pospisil — Charleston CH Round of 32

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Holt B.
6-1 6-3
Pospisil V.
Holt B.
662
Pospisil V.
130

Brandon Holt defeated Vasek Pospisil 6-1 6-3 in the Charleston CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Clear edge
66%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
96
Break points won·Clear edge
31
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
62
Tiebreaks·Even
69
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Pospisil V.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelbayh A.
Crawford O.
6-26-756-3
Semi-finals
Crawford O.
Escobedo E.
6-42-1
Shelbayh A.
Peniston R.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Peniston R.
Walton A.[6]
7-51-66-3
Crawford O.
Dostanic S.
6-16-2
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.[7]
6-37-63
Shelbayh A.
Quinn E.
6-26-4
R16
Escobedo E.
Couacaud E.[1]
7-667-5
Shelbayh A.
Holt B.
7-57-5
Quinn E.
Mayo A.
7-57-5
Dostanic S.
Kirchheimer S.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-3
Crawford O.
Lokoli L.
7-666-2
Peniston R.
Harrison C.
6-26-3
Walton A.[6]
Dougaz A.
6-37-64
R32
Dostanic S.
Ritschard A.[8]
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.
Kodat T.
6-746-34-1
Crawford O.
Sandgren T.[4]
7-56-2
Lokoli L.
Krueger M.
6-47-5
Shelbayh A.
Lajal M.
1-66-46-4
Peniston R.
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Dougaz A.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Holt B.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-16-3
Mayo A.
Geerts M.
6-47-66
Quinn E.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-27-65
Kudla D.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Escobedo E.
Tomic B.
6-35-77-63
Johns G.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-64
Harrison C.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-767-616-2
Couacaud E.[1]
Poljicak M.
6-34-66-3
Walton A.[6]
Mansouri S.
7-656-2