Tomas Machac vs Jack Draper — Orleans CH Final

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
Jack Draper
GBR8
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Machac T.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Draper J.
Machac T.
6462
Draper J.
4631

Tomas Machac defeated Jack Draper 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Orleans CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53. Tomas Machac narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-21ViennaQFhardJack Draper6-3 3-6 6-1
2024-08-26US OpenR16hardJack Draper6-3 6-1 6-2
2024-05-20GenevaR32clayTomas Machac7-6(6) 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Draper J.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
8.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
88
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Even
80
83
Deciding sets·Even
94
96
Tiebreaks·Even
97
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Draper J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3+47 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.7Hard Elo 1783
4.3Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1822
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
6.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Draper J.
Freshness·
—
100

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Draper J.[8]
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Machac T.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-46-1
Draper J.[8]
Van Assche L.[2]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Gasquet R.[1]
Fery A.
7-54-66-3
Van Assche L.[2]
Goffin D.[5]
6-46-3
Draper J.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-16-4
Machac T.
Bonzi B.[4]
7-656-1
R16
Draper J.[8]
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Machac T.
Lestienne C.
6-27-65
Fery A.
Zeppieri G.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.[4]
Paire B.
6-34-66-4
Brouwer G.
Gaston H.[3]
6-13-67-65
Gasquet R.[1]
Ymer E.
7-53-66-1
Goffin D.[5]
Virtanen O.
5-76-46-4
Van Assche L.[2]
Nardi L.
4-67-626-1
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Herbert P.
6-26-4
Brouwer G.
Bourgue M.
7-674-67-65
Gaston H.[3]
Prizmic D.
6-47-62
Goffin D.[5]
Bellucci M.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[4]
Escoffier A.
7-56-3
Zeppieri G.
Diallo G.
6-22-66-4
Draper J.[8]
Albot R.
6-26-2
Van Assche L.[2]
Molcan A.
1-67-626-3
Lamasine T.
Bertola R.
2-66-37-5
Machac T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-696-4
Lestienne C.
De Jong J.
6-37-65
Fery A.
Huesler M.[6]
6-26-3
Paire B.
Jacquet K.
6-16-4
Virtanen O.
Poullain L.
6-36-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Ymer E.
Mensik J.
6-36-2