Misaki Doi vs Petra Martic — Tokyo Round of 32

Tokyo · WTA · Round of 32
JPN
Misaki Doi
35 yrs · 159 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
CRO
Petra Martic
#686WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Doi M.
7-5 6-2
Martic P.
Doi M.
762
Martic P.
520

Misaki Doi defeated Petra Martic 7-5 6-2 in the Tokyo round of 32 on hard. Misaki Doi extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Misaki Doi closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR128clayPetra Martic7-6(2) 7-5
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardMisaki Doi6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Doi M.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Doi M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Doi M.Martic P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Doi M.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
74
Break points saved·Dominant
33
85
Break points won·Clear edge
44
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
56
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Doi M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Martic P.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Kudermetova V.[8]
Pegula J.[2]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[2]
Sakkari M.[4]
6-26-3
Kudermetova V.[8]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
7-666-726-3
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[8]
Swiatek I.[1]
6-22-66-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Alexandrova E.
6-27-5
Sakkari M.[4]
Garcia C.[5]
6-26-2
Pegula J.[2]
Kasatkina D.[6]
6-16-0
R16
Garcia C.[5]
Kalinina A.
6-46-3
Kudermetova V.[8]
Day K.
6-36-3
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Noskova L.
6-34-66-0
Alexandrova E.
Samsonova L.[7]
6-46-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Doi M.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[2]
Bucsa C.
6-16-2
Swiatek I.[1]
Hontama M.
6-47-5
Kasatkina D.[6]
Papamichail D.
6-46-4
R32
Noskova L.
Sakatsume H.
6-27-5
Kasatkina D.[6]
Kostyuk M.
3-66-46-3
Bucsa C.
Saigo R.
6-16-2
Samsonova L.[7]
Maria T.
6-06-2
Hontama M.
Hibino N.
6-26-4
Day K.
Uchijima M.
6-26-2
Kudermetova V.[8]
Dart H.
6-37-64
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Vekic D.
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Kalinskaya A.
6-776-17-5
Kalinina A.
Krueger A.
6-36-1
Doi M.
Martic P.
7-56-2
Papamichail D.
Hosogi S.
7-637-5