Tomas Machac vs Maxime Cressy — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
USA7
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
Machac T.
7-6 6-4
Cressy M.
Machac T.
71162
Cressy M.
6940

Tomas Machac defeated Maxime Cressy 7-6 6-4 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. Tomas Machac claimed a first win over Maxime Cressy in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenR64hardMaxime Cressy6-1 3-6 6-1 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Cressy M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Cressy M.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Cressy M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
13.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
9.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 115). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Cressy M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
24
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Dominant
80
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cressy M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.0
Surface form
6.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Draper J.[8]
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Machac T.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-46-1
Draper J.[8]
Van Assche L.[2]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Gasquet R.[1]
Fery A.
7-54-66-3
Van Assche L.[2]
Goffin D.[5]
6-46-3
Draper J.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-16-4
Machac T.
Bonzi B.[4]
7-656-1
R16
Draper J.[8]
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Machac T.
Lestienne C.
6-27-65
Fery A.
Zeppieri G.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.[4]
Paire B.
6-34-66-4
Brouwer G.
Gaston H.[3]
6-13-67-65
Gasquet R.[1]
Ymer E.
7-53-66-1
Goffin D.[5]
Virtanen O.
5-76-46-4
Van Assche L.[2]
Nardi L.
4-67-626-1
R32
Gasquet R.[1]
Herbert P.
6-26-4
Brouwer G.
Bourgue M.
7-674-67-65
Gaston H.[3]
Prizmic D.
6-47-62
Goffin D.[5]
Bellucci M.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[4]
Escoffier A.
7-56-3
Zeppieri G.
Diallo G.
6-22-66-4
Draper J.[8]
Albot R.
6-26-2
Van Assche L.[2]
Molcan A.
1-67-626-3
Lamasine T.
Bertola R.
2-66-37-5
Machac T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-696-4
Lestienne C.
De Jong J.
6-37-65
Fery A.
Huesler M.[6]
6-26-3
Paire B.
Jacquet K.
6-16-4
Virtanen O.
Poullain L.
6-36-4
Nardi L.
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Ymer E.
Mensik J.
6-36-2