Oliver Crawford vs Laurent Lokoli — Charleston CH Round of 16

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1413Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
Laurent Lokoli
FRA
Laurent Lokoli
#449ATP
1455ELO
1407Hard ELO
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLW
Crawford O.
7-6 6-2
Lokoli L.
Crawford O.
7862
Lokoli L.
6620

Oliver Crawford defeated Laurent Lokoli 7-6 6-2 in the Charleston CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Crawford O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lokoli L.

Lokoli L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Crawford O.Lokoli L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Crawford O.Lokoli L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
84
Break points won·Even
18
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
35
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Crawford O.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Lokoli L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+6 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Hard Elo 1407
5.0Overall Elo 1444
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1455
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelbayh A.
Crawford O.
6-26-756-3
Semi-finals
Crawford O.
Escobedo E.
6-42-1
Shelbayh A.
Peniston R.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Peniston R.
Walton A.[6]
7-51-66-3
Crawford O.
Dostanic S.
6-16-2
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.[7]
6-37-63
Shelbayh A.
Quinn E.
6-26-4
R16
Escobedo E.
Couacaud E.[1]
7-667-5
Shelbayh A.
Holt B.
7-57-5
Quinn E.
Mayo A.
7-57-5
Dostanic S.
Kirchheimer S.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-3
Crawford O.
Lokoli L.
7-666-2
Peniston R.
Harrison C.
6-26-3
Walton A.[6]
Dougaz A.
6-37-64
R32
Dostanic S.
Ritschard A.[8]
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.
Kodat T.
6-746-34-1
Crawford O.
Sandgren T.[4]
7-56-2
Lokoli L.
Krueger M.
6-47-5
Shelbayh A.
Lajal M.
1-66-46-4
Peniston R.
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Dougaz A.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Holt B.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-16-3
Mayo A.
Geerts M.
6-47-66
Quinn E.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-27-65
Kudla D.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Escobedo E.
Tomic B.
6-35-77-63
Johns G.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-64
Harrison C.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-767-616-2
Couacaud E.[1]
Poljicak M.
6-34-66-3
Walton A.[6]
Mansouri S.
7-656-2