Oliver Crawford vs Ernesto Escobedo — Charleston CH Semi-final

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1413Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 25 September 2023
hard
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Crawford O.
6-4 2-1
Escobedo E.
Crawford O.
62–
Escobedo E.
41–

Oliver Crawford advanced when Ernesto Escobedo retired 6-4 2-1 in the Charleston CH semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Crawford O.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Crawford O.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Crawford O.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
84
Break points won·Slight edge
18
12
Deciding sets·Even
19
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Crawford O.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Escobedo E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shelbayh A.
Crawford O.
6-26-756-3
Semi-finals
Crawford O.
Escobedo E.
6-42-1
Shelbayh A.
Peniston R.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Peniston R.
Walton A.[6]
7-51-66-3
Crawford O.
Dostanic S.
6-16-2
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.[7]
6-37-63
Shelbayh A.
Quinn E.
6-26-4
R16
Escobedo E.
Couacaud E.[1]
7-667-5
Shelbayh A.
Holt B.
7-57-5
Quinn E.
Mayo A.
7-57-5
Dostanic S.
Kirchheimer S.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-3
Crawford O.
Lokoli L.
7-666-2
Peniston R.
Harrison C.
6-26-3
Walton A.[6]
Dougaz A.
6-37-64
R32
Dostanic S.
Ritschard A.[8]
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.
Kodat T.
6-746-34-1
Crawford O.
Sandgren T.[4]
7-56-2
Lokoli L.
Krueger M.
6-47-5
Shelbayh A.
Lajal M.
1-66-46-4
Peniston R.
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Dougaz A.
Holmgren A.
6-36-4
Holt B.
Pospisil V.[3]
6-16-3
Mayo A.
Geerts M.
6-47-66
Quinn E.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-27-65
Kudla D.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Escobedo E.
Tomic B.
6-35-77-63
Johns G.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-64
Harrison C.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-767-616-2
Couacaud E.[1]
Poljicak M.
6-34-66-3
Walton A.[6]
Mansouri S.
7-656-2