Vasek Pospisil vs James Tracy — Columbus CH Round of 16

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN4
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
USA
James Tracy
#1661ATP
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Pospisil V.
6-3 6-4
Tracy J.
Pospisil V.
662
Tracy J.
340

Vasek Pospisil defeated James Tracy 6-3 6-4 in the Columbus CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — James Tracy came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tracy J.

Tracy J.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Tracy J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tracy J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4