Denis Kudla vs Ryan Peniston — Columbus CH Semi-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA2
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Kudla D.
7-5 6-2
Peniston R.
Kudla D.
762
Peniston R.
520

Denis Kudla defeated Ryan Peniston 7-5 6-2 in the Columbus CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
20
Break points saved·Dominant
90
60
Break points won·Slight edge
19
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
30
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Peniston R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
8.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4