Cannon Kingsley vs Alexander Ritschard — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Kingsley C.
6-1 6-4
Ritschard A.
Kingsley C.
662
Ritschard A.
140

Cannon Kingsley defeated Alexander Ritschard 6-1 6-4 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cannon Kingsley came in ranked #421, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kingsley C.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Slight edge
19
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ritschard A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1345
Surface ELO
6.4+110 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1342
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4