Zsombor Piros vs Calvin Hemery — Sibiu CH Quarter-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
FRA
Calvin Hemery
#298ATP
1439ELO
1449Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Piros Z.
6-3 4-6 6-1
Hemery C.
Piros Z.
6462
Hemery C.
3611

Zsombor Piros defeated Calvin Hemery 6-3 4-6 6-1 in the Sibiu CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hemery C.

Hemery C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Hemery C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Hemery C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
45
Break points saved·Even
84
85
Break points won·Dominant
32
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Hemery C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+172 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1449
7.9Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1439
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
7.5
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
3.9
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Hemery C.
Freshness·Clear edge
54
69

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Hemery C.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3