Cannon Kingsley vs Christian Harrison — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
USA
Christian Harrison
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWWL
Kingsley C.
7-5 6-4
Harrison C.
Kingsley C.
762
Harrison C.
540

Cannon Kingsley defeated Christian Harrison 7-5 6-4 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Cannon Kingsley came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Harrison C.

Harrison C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Harrison C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kingsley C.Harrison C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
34
Break points saved·Even
74
78
Break points won·Clear edge
19
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
49
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
20
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Harrison C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4