Federico Agustin Gomez vs Ethan Quinn — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1403Hard ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Gomez F.
7-5 7-6
Quinn E.
Gomez F.
7772
Quinn E.
5630

Federico Agustin Gomez defeated Ethan Quinn 7-5 7-6 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Quinn E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gomez F.Quinn E.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gomez F.Quinn E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez F.Quinn E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
95
Break points won·Even
18
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez F.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Quinn E.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.4Hard Elo 1403
Surface ELO
9.6+365 Hard Elo edge
0.4Overall Elo 1445
ELO gap
9.6Overall Elo 1804
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez F.Quinn E.
Freshness·Dominant
59
97

Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d) · Quinn E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4