Michael Geerts vs Mitchell Krueger — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Geerts M.
7-5 6-2
Krueger M.
Geerts M.
762
Krueger M.
520

Michael Geerts defeated Mitchell Krueger 7-5 6-2 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
9
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
87
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
8
13
Tiebreaks·Even
2
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Krueger M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
6.0+53 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1461
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Krueger M.
Freshness·Even
89
87

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4