Alexis Galarneau vs Cannon Kingsley — Columbus CH Semi-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Alexis Galarneau
CAN6
Alexis Galarneau
#158ATP
1593ELO
1548Hard ELO
$166kYTD
$825kCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Galarneau A.
6-4 7-6
Kingsley C.
Galarneau A.
6772
Kingsley C.
4620

Alexis Galarneau defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 7-6 in the Columbus CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Alexis Galarneau came in ranked #158, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galarneau A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Galarneau A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galarneau A.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galarneau A.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
21
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
74
Break points won·Even
16
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
22
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galarneau A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kingsley C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+204 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1345
8.1Overall Elo 1593
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1342
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.4
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Galarneau A.Kingsley C.
Freshness·
59
—

Galarneau A.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[6]
Kingsley C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[6]
Couacaud E.[1]
6-36-4
Peniston R.
Pospisil V.[4]
7-53-66-4
Kudla D.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Kingsley C.
Harrison C.
7-56-4
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Lokoli L.
7-57-65
Kudla D.[2]
Geerts M.
7-53-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[7]
4-66-36-1
Peniston R.
Sandgren T.[5]
7-606-1
Harrison C.
Svajda Z.[8]
6-47-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
Couacaud E.[1]
Gomez F.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.[4]
Tracy J.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Tomic B.
3-1
Harrison C.
Dougaz A.
6-14-0
Pospisil V.[4]
Basavareddy N.
7-52-67-5
Gomez F.
Quinn E.
7-57-63
Kudla D.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-4
Geerts M.
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-3
Tracy J.
Boulais J.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Ritschard A.
6-16-4
Trotter J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-04-66-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Lokoli L.
Anthrop J.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.[1]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Walton A.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4