Ivan Gakhov vs Alexander Weis — Sibiu CH Round of 16

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS4
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Gakhov I.
7-6 6-7 7-6
Weis A.
Gakhov I.
7761772
Weis A.
6577651

Ivan Gakhov defeated Alexander Weis 7-6 6-7 7-6 in the Sibiu CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ivan Gakhov came in ranked #388, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Ivan Gakhov extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-15MunichQ1clayIvan Gakhov7-6(4) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Weis A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Weis A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Weis A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
4
Break points saved·Dominant
82
50
Break points won·Even
9
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Weis A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3