Ivan Gakhov vs Clement Tabur — Sibiu CH Round of 32

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS4
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Gakhov I.
6-1 4-6 7-5
Tabur C.
Gakhov I.
6472
Tabur C.
1651

Ivan Gakhov defeated Clement Tabur 6-1 4-6 7-5 in the Sibiu CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
74
Break points won·Clear edge
9
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
40
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
6.9+169 Clay Elo edge
2.8Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
7.2Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Tabur C.
Freshness·
—
55

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3