Nerman Fatic vs Zsombor Piros — Sibiu CH Semi-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
BIH8
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Fatic N.
6-2 1-6 6-1
Piros Z.
Fatic N.
6162
Piros Z.
2611

Nerman Fatic defeated Zsombor Piros 6-2 1-6 6-1 in the Sibiu CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in three sets, 6–2 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
84
Break points won·Even
36
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
7.3+142 Clay Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1661
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
54

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3