Nerman Fatic vs Vlad Andrei Dancu — Sibiu CH Round of 32

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH8
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
ROU
Vlad Andrei Dancu
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWLL
Fatic N.
6-4 6-4
Dancu V.
Fatic N.
662
Dancu V.
440

Nerman Fatic defeated Vlad Andrei Dancu 6-4 6-4 in the Sibiu CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nerman Fatic came in defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Dancu V.

Dancu V.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Serve advantage — Dancu V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Dancu V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Dancu V.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3