Nerman Fatic vs Riccardo Bonadio — Sibiu CH Round of 16

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BIH8
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2023
clay
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Fatic N.
5-7 7-6 6-4
Bonadio R.
Fatic N.
57962
Bonadio R.
76741

Nerman Fatic defeated Riccardo Bonadio 5-7 7-6 6-4 in the Sibiu CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Bonadio R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Bonadio R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Bonadio R.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
70
Break points won·Clear edge
36
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bonadio R.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
3.6
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Cobolli F.[2]
7-56-4
Fatic N.[8]
Piros Z.[1]
6-21-66-1
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.[8]
Gakhov I.[4]
6-12-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Ajdukovic D.[6]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Travaglia S.[5]
6-46-4
Piros Z.[1]
Hemery C.
6-34-66-1
R16
Gakhov I.[4]
Weis A.
7-656-717-65
Cobolli F.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-56-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Echargui M.
6-46-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-3
Piros Z.[1]
Paulson A.
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Fonio G.
4-66-36-2
Hemery C.
Artnak B.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[8]
Bonadio R.
5-77-676-4
R32
Artnak B.
Giannessi A.[7]
3-0
Piros Z.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Weis A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-66-2
Paulson A.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.
Jianu F.
7-646-4
Hemery C.
Valkusz M.
6-16-1
Fonio G.
Cretu C.
7-616-3
Blancaneaux G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-756-46-4
Gakhov I.[4]
Tabur C.
6-14-67-5
Bonadio R.
Diez S.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Ionel N.
6-37-62
Fatic N.[8]
Dancu V.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
3-66-36-4
Echargui M.
Laaksonen H.
2-66-06-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Gima S.
7-626-3