Zachary Svajda vs Ethan Quinn — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zachary Svajda
USA8
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Svajda Z.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Quinn E.
Svajda Z.
4662
Quinn E.
6341

Zachary Svajda defeated Ethan Quinn 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. Zachary Svajda extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-10Delray BeachQ2hardZachary Svajda7-6(1) 6-3
2024-07-22AtlantaQ1hardZachary Svajda6-4 7-5
2024-02-12Delray BeachQ1hardZachary Svajda6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Quinn E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Quinn E.
30
Serve
37
12
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Quinn E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Quinn E.
Clutch Rating·Even
69
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
95
Break points won·Dominant
66
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Quinn E.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1690
Surface ELO
6.0+77 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1804
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
2.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Quinn E.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
94

Svajda Z.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Quinn E.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
6-43-67-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Hijikata R.[1]
7-634-66-1
Semi-finals
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Kypson P.
6-7106-36-1
Walton A.
Broady L.[3]
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Walton A.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Wu T.
6-37-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Broady L.[3]
Harris L.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-646-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Samuel T.
7-55-76-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
R16
Hijikata R.[2]
Ritschard A.
7-646-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-65
Broady L.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-3
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[6]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Vallejo A.
6-13-66-1
Walton A.
Harris B.
3-67-677-63
Harris L.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-54-1
Samuel T.
Marchenko I.
7-56-766-1
Kypson P.
Walton A.[4]
7-56-3
Michelsen A.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Andreozzi G.[7]
Harrison C.
6-17-63
Vives Marcos P.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[1]
Langmo C.
6-44-66-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Johns G.
6-36-3
R32
Hijikata R.[2]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[6]
Quinn E.
6-726-36-1
Cazaux A.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Broady L.[3]
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Ritschard A.
Fratangelo B.
6-34-66-2
Walton A.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gomez E.[7]
7-57-65
Ellis B.
Sandgren T.
6-31-66-3
Peniston R.
Poling K.
6-21-67-5
Dostanic S.
Svajda Z.
7-656-3
Vallejo A.
Riedi L.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mochizuki Y.
4-66-36-2
Hong S.
Shevchenko A.[1]
3-66-37-64
Vives Marcos P.
Ejupovic E.
6-24-66-2
Johns G.
Blanch D.
6-23-67-62
Samuel T.
Schnur B.
6-36-756-3
Kirchheimer S.
Schoolkate T.
6-756-37-63
Andreozzi G.[7]
Angele J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.[8]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Kingsley C.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Young D.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Harrison C.
Mayo A.
4-66-46-2
Marchenko I.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-47-62
Michelsen A.[2]
Janvier M.
5-77-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Jansen W.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-24-66-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Rodenas P.
6-36-1