Arjun Kadhe vs Filip Peliwo — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
IND
Arjun Kadhe
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#479ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Kadhe A.
7-6 6-1
Peliwo F.
Kadhe A.
7762
Peliwo F.
6310

Arjun Kadhe defeated Filip Peliwo 7-6 6-1 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arjun Kadhe came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kadhe A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Peliwo F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kadhe A.

Serve advantage — Peliwo F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kadhe A.Peliwo F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
30%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kadhe A.Peliwo F.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Slight edge
32
23
Break points won·Slight edge
1
11
Deciding sets·Even
13
10
Tiebreaks·Even
39
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kadhe A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Peliwo F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
2.6
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[5]
Polmans M.[2]
4-67-676-4
Semi-finals
Atmane T.[5]
Yunchaokete B.[4]
6-36-4
Polmans M.[2]
Donskoy E.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[2]
Tu L.[8]
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Sweeny D.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Jasika O.
3-67-656-2
Atmane T.[5]
Oconnell C.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Jasika O.
Shang J.[3]
6-35-0
Atmane T.[5]
Ayeni O.
7-627-61
Polmans M.[2]
Sinclair C.
6-46-4
Tu L.[8]
Wang A.
6-746-26-3
Sweeny D.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-617-5
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-24-66-2
R32
Kachmazov A.
Li Z.
6-36-4
Wang A.
Mu T.
6-21-66-1
Polmans M.[2]
Weber A.
7-657-5
Kadhe A.
Peliwo F.
7-636-1
Sinclair C.
Castelnuovo L.
6-16-2
Tu L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-12-66-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Bellier A.
6-47-62
Ayeni O.
Mo Y.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Moriya H.
6-32-66-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Zhu E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Palan D.
7-666-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Sweeny D.
Sun Q.
6-16-2
Shang J.[3]
Haliak M.
6-776-16-2
Jasika O.
Bolt A.
5-76-27-66
Atmane T.[5]
Giustino L.
6-04-66-3