Omar Jasika vs Juncheng Shang — Guangzhou CH Round of 16

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
CHN3
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Jasika O.
6-3 5-0
Shang J.
Jasika O.
65–
Shang J.
30–

Omar Jasika advanced when Juncheng Shang retired 6-3 5-0 in the Guangzhou CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Shang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jasika O.Shang J.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Shang J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
76
Break points saved·Dominant
47
96
Break points won·Dominant
13
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Shang J.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.0Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
10.0+427 Hard Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
7.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[5]
Polmans M.[2]
4-67-676-4
Semi-finals
Atmane T.[5]
Yunchaokete B.[4]
6-36-4
Polmans M.[2]
Donskoy E.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[2]
Tu L.[8]
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Sweeny D.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Jasika O.
3-67-656-2
Atmane T.[5]
Oconnell C.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Jasika O.
Shang J.[3]
6-35-0
Atmane T.[5]
Ayeni O.
7-627-61
Polmans M.[2]
Sinclair C.
6-46-4
Tu L.[8]
Wang A.
6-746-26-3
Sweeny D.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-617-5
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-24-66-2
R32
Kachmazov A.
Li Z.
6-36-4
Wang A.
Mu T.
6-21-66-1
Polmans M.[2]
Weber A.
7-657-5
Kadhe A.
Peliwo F.
7-636-1
Sinclair C.
Castelnuovo L.
6-16-2
Tu L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-12-66-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Bellier A.
6-47-62
Ayeni O.
Mo Y.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Moriya H.
6-32-66-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Zhu E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Palan D.
7-666-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Sweeny D.
Sun Q.
6-16-2
Shang J.[3]
Haliak M.
6-776-16-2
Jasika O.
Bolt A.
5-76-27-66
Atmane T.[5]
Giustino L.
6-04-66-3