Mai Hontama vs Su Jeong Jang — Osaka Round of 32

Osaka · WTA · Round of 32
Mai Hontama
JPN
Mai Hontama
#202WTA
1480ELO
1442Hard ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
KOR
Su Jeong Jang
#657WTA
1384ELO
1355Hard ELO
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Hontama M.
7-5 0-6 6-2
Jang S.
Hontama M.
7062
Jang S.
5621

Mai Hontama defeated Su Jeong Jang 7-5 0-6 6-2 in the Osaka round of 32 on hard. Mai Hontama claimed a first win over Su Jeong Jang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Mai Hontama closed it out in three sets, 7–5 0–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-15BJK Cup G1 RR: JPN vs KORRRclaySu Jeong Jang6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hontama M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Jang S.

Jang S.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Hontama M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hontama M.Jang S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
43%
Service points won·Even
54%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
43%
Break points saved·Even
53%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hontama M.Jang S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
27
35
Break points won·Clear edge
96
76
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
14
Tiebreaks·
68
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hontama M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 149 days (−1.5)
Jang S.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 224 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.8+87 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1355
5.8Overall Elo 1480
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1384
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
4.3
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hontama M.Jang S.
Freshness·
100
—

Hontama M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Krueger A.
Zhu L.[1]
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Zhu L.[1]
Wang X.[3]
7-57-66
Krueger A.
Hontama M.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[3]
Putintseva Y.[6]
7-646-716-3
Zhu L.[1]
Mandlik E.
6-36-2
Krueger A.
Kalinskaya A.
6-36-1
Hontama M.
Hartono A.
6-726-46-1
R16
Wang X.[3]
Sakatsume H.
6-46-2
Kalinskaya A.
Dart H.
7-656-2
Mandlik E.
Marino R.
7-53-66-1
Krueger A.
Ponchet J.
6-46-1
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-36-3
Hartono A.
Udvardy P.
6-26-0
Putintseva Y.[6]
Savinykh V.
6-16-2
Zhu L.[1]
Uchijima M.
6-44-66-1
R32
Wang X.[3]
Teichmann J.
7-636-3
Mandlik E.
Parry D.
7-56-2
Marino R.
Hibino N.[7]
6-36-4
Zhu L.[1]
Wang X.
6-46-4
Uchijima M.
Raina A.
6-46-2
Sakatsume H.
Eala A.
6-06-3
Putintseva Y.[6]
Shnaider D.
6-26-3
Krueger A.
Baindl K.[8]
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.
Niemeier J.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Fruhvirtova L.[4]
7-55-76-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Yuan Y.
6-43-67-5
Hartono A.
Doi M.
6-23-66-3
Ponchet J.
Golubic V.
6-46-2
Hontama M.
Jang S.
7-50-66-2
Udvardy P.
Maria T.[2]
2-66-47-65
Savinykh V.
Friedsam A.
6-41-66-3