Zachary Svajda vs Rinky Hijikata — Cary CH Final

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Zachary Svajda
USA8
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
Rinky Hijikata
AUS1
Rinky Hijikata
#97ATP
1748ELO
1694Hard ELO
$601kYTD
$4.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLW
Svajda Z.
7-6 4-6 6-1
Hijikata R.
Svajda Z.
77462
Hijikata R.
63611

Zachary Svajda defeated Rinky Hijikata 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Cary CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Zachary Svajda came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hijikata R.

Hijikata R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Serve advantage — Svajda Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Hijikata R.
30
Serve
21
12
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Hijikata R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Hijikata R.
Clutch Rating·Even
69
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
95
Break points won·Dominant
66
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Hijikata R.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2Hard Elo 1690
Surface ELO
4.8+4 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1748
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.5
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Hijikata R.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
94

Svajda Z.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Hijikata R.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
6-43-67-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Hijikata R.[1]
7-634-66-1
Semi-finals
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Kypson P.
6-7106-36-1
Walton A.
Broady L.[3]
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Walton A.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Wu T.
6-37-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Broady L.[3]
Harris L.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-646-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Samuel T.
7-55-76-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
R16
Hijikata R.[2]
Ritschard A.
7-646-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-65
Broady L.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-3
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[6]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Vallejo A.
6-13-66-1
Walton A.
Harris B.
3-67-677-63
Harris L.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-54-1
Samuel T.
Marchenko I.
7-56-766-1
Kypson P.
Walton A.[4]
7-56-3
Michelsen A.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Andreozzi G.[7]
Harrison C.
6-17-63
Vives Marcos P.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[1]
Langmo C.
6-44-66-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Johns G.
6-36-3
R32
Hijikata R.[2]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[6]
Quinn E.
6-726-36-1
Cazaux A.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Broady L.[3]
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Ritschard A.
Fratangelo B.
6-34-66-2
Walton A.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gomez E.[7]
7-57-65
Ellis B.
Sandgren T.
6-31-66-3
Peniston R.
Poling K.
6-21-67-5
Dostanic S.
Svajda Z.
7-656-3
Vallejo A.
Riedi L.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mochizuki Y.
4-66-36-2
Hong S.
Shevchenko A.[1]
3-66-37-64
Vives Marcos P.
Ejupovic E.
6-24-66-2
Johns G.
Blanch D.
6-23-67-62
Samuel T.
Schnur B.
6-36-756-3
Kirchheimer S.
Schoolkate T.
6-756-37-63
Andreozzi G.[7]
Angele J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.[8]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Kingsley C.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Young D.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Harrison C.
Mayo A.
4-66-46-2
Marchenko I.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-47-62
Michelsen A.[2]
Janvier M.
5-77-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Jansen W.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-24-66-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Rodenas P.
6-36-1