Arianne Hartono vs Misaki Doi — Osaka Round of 32

Osaka · WTA · Round of 32
NED
Arianne Hartono
#418WTA
1453ELO
1436Hard ELO
30 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
JPN
Misaki Doi
35 yrs · 159 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLWL
Hartono A.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Doi M.
Hartono A.
6362
Doi M.
2631

Arianne Hartono defeated Misaki Doi 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Osaka round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arianne Hartono closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hartono A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Doi M.

Doi M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hartono A.

Serve advantage — Doi M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hartono A.Doi M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
64%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.7
0.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hartono A.Doi M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
47
33
Break points won·Dominant
81
44
Deciding sets·Even
26
24
Tiebreaks·
—
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hartono A.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Doi M.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 303 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.3
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Krueger A.
Zhu L.[1]
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Zhu L.[1]
Wang X.[3]
7-57-66
Krueger A.
Hontama M.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Wang X.[3]
Putintseva Y.[6]
7-646-716-3
Zhu L.[1]
Mandlik E.
6-36-2
Krueger A.
Kalinskaya A.
6-36-1
Hontama M.
Hartono A.
6-726-46-1
R16
Wang X.[3]
Sakatsume H.
6-46-2
Kalinskaya A.
Dart H.
7-656-2
Mandlik E.
Marino R.
7-53-66-1
Krueger A.
Ponchet J.
6-46-1
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-36-3
Hartono A.
Udvardy P.
6-26-0
Putintseva Y.[6]
Savinykh V.
6-16-2
Zhu L.[1]
Uchijima M.
6-44-66-1
R32
Wang X.[3]
Teichmann J.
7-636-3
Mandlik E.
Parry D.
7-56-2
Marino R.
Hibino N.[7]
6-36-4
Zhu L.[1]
Wang X.
6-46-4
Uchijima M.
Raina A.
6-46-2
Sakatsume H.
Eala A.
6-06-3
Putintseva Y.[6]
Shnaider D.
6-26-3
Krueger A.
Baindl K.[8]
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.
Niemeier J.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Fruhvirtova L.[4]
7-55-76-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Yuan Y.
6-43-67-5
Hartono A.
Doi M.
6-23-66-3
Ponchet J.
Golubic V.
6-46-2
Hontama M.
Jang S.
7-50-66-2
Udvardy P.
Maria T.[2]
2-66-47-65
Savinykh V.
Friedsam A.
6-41-66-3