Li Tu vs Nick Chappell — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS8
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Tu L.
6-1 2-6 6-2
Chappell N.
Tu L.
6262
Chappell N.
1621

Li Tu defeated Nick Chappell 6-1 2-6 6-2 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
0
Break points saved·Dominant
82
29
Break points won·Even
8
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[5]
Polmans M.[2]
4-67-676-4
Semi-finals
Atmane T.[5]
Yunchaokete B.[4]
6-36-4
Polmans M.[2]
Donskoy E.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[2]
Tu L.[8]
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Sweeny D.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Jasika O.
3-67-656-2
Atmane T.[5]
Oconnell C.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Jasika O.
Shang J.[3]
6-35-0
Atmane T.[5]
Ayeni O.
7-627-61
Polmans M.[2]
Sinclair C.
6-46-4
Tu L.[8]
Wang A.
6-746-26-3
Sweeny D.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-617-5
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-24-66-2
R32
Kachmazov A.
Li Z.
6-36-4
Wang A.
Mu T.
6-21-66-1
Polmans M.[2]
Weber A.
7-657-5
Kadhe A.
Peliwo F.
7-636-1
Sinclair C.
Castelnuovo L.
6-16-2
Tu L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-12-66-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Bellier A.
6-47-62
Ayeni O.
Mo Y.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Moriya H.
6-32-66-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Zhu E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Palan D.
7-666-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Sweeny D.
Sun Q.
6-16-2
Shang J.[3]
Haliak M.
6-776-16-2
Jasika O.
Bolt A.
5-76-27-66
Atmane T.[5]
Giustino L.
6-04-66-3