Terence Atmane vs Christopher Oconnell — Guangzhou CH Quarter-final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Terence Atmane
FRA5
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2023
hard
AUS1
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Atmane T.
7-5 6-3
Oconnell C.
Atmane T.
762
Oconnell C.
530

Terence Atmane defeated Christopher Oconnell 7-5 6-3 in the Guangzhou CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Oconnell C.
36
Serve
20
27
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Even
7.5
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
49
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Even
25
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
38
Tiebreaks·Even
96
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Oconnell C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5+17 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1657
6.0Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1673
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
7.7
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.0
Minutes 14d
6.1
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Oconnell C.
Freshness·
95
—

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[5]
Polmans M.[2]
4-67-676-4
Semi-finals
Atmane T.[5]
Yunchaokete B.[4]
6-36-4
Polmans M.[2]
Donskoy E.[7]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[2]
Tu L.[8]
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Sweeny D.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Jasika O.
3-67-656-2
Atmane T.[5]
Oconnell C.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Jasika O.
Shang J.[3]
6-35-0
Atmane T.[5]
Ayeni O.
7-627-61
Polmans M.[2]
Sinclair C.
6-46-4
Tu L.[8]
Wang A.
6-746-26-3
Sweeny D.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-617-5
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Oconnell C.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Kachmazov A.
6-24-66-2
R32
Kachmazov A.
Li Z.
6-36-4
Wang A.
Mu T.
6-21-66-1
Polmans M.[2]
Weber A.
7-657-5
Kadhe A.
Peliwo F.
7-636-1
Sinclair C.
Castelnuovo L.
6-16-2
Tu L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-12-66-2
Donskoy E.[7]
Bellier A.
6-47-62
Ayeni O.
Mo Y.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Moriya H.
6-32-66-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Zhu E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Palan D.
7-666-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Sweeny D.
Sun Q.
6-16-2
Shang J.[3]
Haliak M.
6-776-16-2
Jasika O.
Bolt A.
5-76-27-66
Atmane T.[5]
Giustino L.
6-04-66-3