Sumit Nagal vs Vitaliy Sachko — Tulln CH Round of 16

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
clay
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR8
Vitaliy Sachko
#195ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Nagal S.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Sachko V.
Nagal S.
77362
Sachko V.
62631

Sumit Nagal defeated Vitaliy Sachko 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Tulln CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Sachko V.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Sachko V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Sachko V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
81
Break points won·Clear edge
35
48
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Sachko V.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.7Clay Elo 1538
Surface ELO
5.3+12 Clay Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.9
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Sachko V.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
83

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sachko V.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.
Nagal S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Nagal S.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-36-4
Kopriva V.
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Kuzmanov D.
6-16-1
Cobolli F.[4]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Marterer M.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-47-61
Nagal S.
Ramos A.[1]
7-666-3
R16
Cobolli F.[4]
Laaksonen H.
5-0
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Gakhov I.[6]
6-746-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Svrcina D.[7]
2-66-46-2
Nagal S.
Sachko V.[8]
7-623-66-3
Kopriva V.
Rodionov J.[2]
7-52-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Stodder T.
7-696-1
Squire H.
Miedler L.
4-66-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Melzer G.
6-36-2
R32
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Molleker R.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-627-61
Stodder T.
Diez S.
1-66-26-1
Svrcina D.[7]
Moeller M.
1-66-46-1
Nagal S.
Masur D.
6-16-2
Squire H.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-736-26-4
Rodionov J.[2]
Ejupovic E.
7-642-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Rosol L.
6-43-66-3
Laaksonen H.
Jahn J.
6-756-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Novak D.
6-736-27-5
Kopriva V.
Kolar Z.
6-27-64
Gakhov I.[6]
Hassan B.
7-56-4
Miedler L.
Oberleitner N.
7-642-66-3
Cobolli F.[4]
Sels J.
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Kopp S.
6-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Misolic F.
6-47-62