Albert Ramos vs Gerald Melzer — Tulln CH Round of 16

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
clay
AUT
Gerald Melzer
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWW
Ramos A.
6-3 6-2
Melzer G.
Ramos A.
662
Melzer G.
320

Albert Ramos defeated Gerald Melzer 6-3 6-2 in the Tulln CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-05QuitoQFclayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Melzer G.

Melzer G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Melzer G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Melzer G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Melzer G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
77
Break points won·Dominant
49
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
53
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
22
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Melzer G.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.
Nagal S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Nagal S.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-36-4
Kopriva V.
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Kuzmanov D.
6-16-1
Cobolli F.[4]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Marterer M.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-47-61
Nagal S.
Ramos A.[1]
7-666-3
R16
Cobolli F.[4]
Laaksonen H.
5-0
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Gakhov I.[6]
6-746-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Svrcina D.[7]
2-66-46-2
Nagal S.
Sachko V.[8]
7-623-66-3
Kopriva V.
Rodionov J.[2]
7-52-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Stodder T.
7-696-1
Squire H.
Miedler L.
4-66-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Melzer G.
6-36-2
R32
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Molleker R.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-627-61
Stodder T.
Diez S.
1-66-26-1
Svrcina D.[7]
Moeller M.
1-66-46-1
Nagal S.
Masur D.
6-16-2
Squire H.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-736-26-4
Rodionov J.[2]
Ejupovic E.
7-642-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Rosol L.
6-43-66-3
Laaksonen H.
Jahn J.
6-756-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Novak D.
6-736-27-5
Kopriva V.
Kolar Z.
6-27-64
Gakhov I.[6]
Hassan B.
7-56-4
Miedler L.
Oberleitner N.
7-642-66-3
Cobolli F.[4]
Sels J.
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Kopp S.
6-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Misolic F.
6-47-62