Maximilian Marterer vs Lukas Rosol — Tulln CH Round of 32

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER3
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
clay
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Marterer M.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Rosol L.
Marterer M.
6362
Rosol L.
4631

Maximilian Marterer defeated Lukas Rosol 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Tulln CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marterer M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Serve advantage — Marterer M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marterer M.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marterer M.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Even
47
51
Break points saved·Even
93
89
Break points won·Slight edge
13
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marterer M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Rosol L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 12
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.
Nagal S.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Nagal S.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-36-4
Kopriva V.
Marterer M.[3]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Kuzmanov D.
6-16-1
Cobolli F.[4]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Marterer M.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-47-61
Nagal S.
Ramos A.[1]
7-666-3
R16
Cobolli F.[4]
Laaksonen H.
5-0
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Gakhov I.[6]
6-746-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Svrcina D.[7]
2-66-46-2
Nagal S.
Sachko V.[8]
7-623-66-3
Kopriva V.
Rodionov J.[2]
7-52-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Stodder T.
7-696-1
Squire H.
Miedler L.
4-66-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Melzer G.
6-36-2
R32
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Molleker R.
7-56-4
Sachko V.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-627-61
Stodder T.
Diez S.
1-66-26-1
Svrcina D.[7]
Moeller M.
1-66-46-1
Nagal S.
Masur D.
6-16-2
Squire H.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-736-26-4
Rodionov J.[2]
Ejupovic E.
7-642-66-4
Marterer M.[3]
Rosol L.
6-43-66-3
Laaksonen H.
Jahn J.
6-756-47-64
Kuzmanov D.
Novak D.
6-736-27-5
Kopriva V.
Kolar Z.
6-27-64
Gakhov I.[6]
Hassan B.
7-56-4
Miedler L.
Oberleitner N.
7-642-66-3
Cobolli F.[4]
Sels J.
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Kopp S.
6-36-4
Ramos A.[1]
Misolic F.
6-47-62