Nam Hoang Ly vs Tung Lin Wu — Shanghai CH Round of 16

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE5
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Ly N.
3-6 6-1 6-2
Wu T.
Ly N.
3662
Wu T.
6121

Nam Hoang Ly defeated Tung Lin Wu 3-6 6-1 6-2 in the Shanghai CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ly N.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ly N.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ly N.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wu T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
1.4
Surface form
7.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ly N.Wu T.
Freshness·
—
88

Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[1]
Watanuki Y.[2]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[1]
Tu L.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[2]
Shang J.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Shang J.[4]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Bai Y.
6-06-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-0
Tu L.
Bellier A.
7-666-2
R16
Oconnell C.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-1
Tu L.
Peliwo F.
7-656-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-1
Ly N.
Wu T.[5]
3-66-16-2
Giustino L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-16-4
Bellier A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-653-66-4
Bai Y.
Palan D.
6-36-2
Shang J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-3
R32
Watanuki Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Mu T.
6-34-67-5
Wu T.[5]
Sun F.
7-653-66-2
Bellier A.
Kadhe A.
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Te R.
6-26-4
Atmane T.[7]
Jasika O.
6-37-61
Tu L.
Sekulic P.
6-16-0
Palan D.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-26-4
Uchiyama Y.
Liu H.
6-17-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Haliak M.
Ayeni O.
6-23-66-3
Sweeny D.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Peliwo F.
Polmans M.[3]
6-16-3
Shang J.[4]
Strombachs R.
6-47-64
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-46-0