Jesper De Jong vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard — Istanbul CH Quarter-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED2
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRA
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
#89ATP
1738ELO
1672Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$3.5MCAREER
23 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
De Jong J.
7-5 6-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
De Jong J.
762
Mpetshi Perricard G.
540

Jesper De Jong defeated Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 7-5 6-4 in the Istanbul CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Mpetshi Perricard G.

Mpetshi Perricard G.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

De Jong J.Mpetshi Perricard G.
23
Serve
81
17
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Mpetshi Perricard G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
30%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
15.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Mpetshi Perricard G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
65
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
98
Break points won·Dominant
37
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mpetshi Perricard G.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1607
Surface ELO
6.2+65 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1738
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
6.5
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Mpetshi Perricard G.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
96

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Mpetshi Perricard G.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[7]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Klein L.[3]
De Jong J.[2]
7-626-727-65
Dzumhur D.[7]
Hardt N.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Hardt N.
Celikbilek A.
1-67-654-1
Klein L.[3]
Yevseyev D.
7-656-737-62
Dzumhur D.[7]
Prizmic D.[4]
6-36-737-5
De Jong J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
R16
Hardt N.
Tomic B.
6-23-67-66
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Mayot H.[6]
6-716-36-3
Klein L.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Prizmic D.[4]
Bicknell B.
4-66-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Kirci K.
6-27-64
Celikbilek A.
Oliel Y.
2-66-46-3
De Jong J.[2]
Monday J.
7-56-1
Dzumhur D.[7]
Erel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Erel Y.
Cukierman D.
6-21-0
Kirci K.
Borg L.
6-13-66-3
Bicknell B.
Martineau M.
6-757-636-3
Kirkin E.
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Prizmic D.[4]
Wessels L.
6-26-737-5
Oliel Y.
Copil M.
6-26-4
Klein L.[3]
Damm M.
6-44-67-5
Mayot H.[6]
Dougaz A.
7-647-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ilkel C.
7-56-4
Yevseyev D.
Gombos N.[8]
4-66-16-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Duran T.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.
Onclin G.[5]
6-16-0
Monday J.
Zuk K.
4-66-16-4
De Jong J.[2]
Ilhan M.
6-26-736-2
Hardt N.
Kwon S.[1]
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Mansouri S.
6-36-4