Nick Hardt vs Bernard Tomic — Istanbul CH Round of 16

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nick Hardt
DOM
Nick Hardt
#275ATP
1473ELO
1414Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Hardt N.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Tomic B.
Hardt N.
63782
Tomic B.
26661

Nick Hardt defeated Bernard Tomic 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Istanbul CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Hardt closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hardt N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hardt N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hardt N.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hardt N.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
53
Break points saved·Dominant
33
92
Break points won·Dominant
32
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hardt N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tomic B.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hardt N.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
83
84

Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[7]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Klein L.[3]
De Jong J.[2]
7-626-727-65
Dzumhur D.[7]
Hardt N.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Hardt N.
Celikbilek A.
1-67-654-1
Klein L.[3]
Yevseyev D.
7-656-737-62
Dzumhur D.[7]
Prizmic D.[4]
6-36-737-5
De Jong J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
R16
Hardt N.
Tomic B.
6-23-67-66
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Mayot H.[6]
6-716-36-3
Klein L.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Prizmic D.[4]
Bicknell B.
4-66-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Kirci K.
6-27-64
Celikbilek A.
Oliel Y.
2-66-46-3
De Jong J.[2]
Monday J.
7-56-1
Dzumhur D.[7]
Erel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Erel Y.
Cukierman D.
6-21-0
Kirci K.
Borg L.
6-13-66-3
Bicknell B.
Martineau M.
6-757-636-3
Kirkin E.
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Prizmic D.[4]
Wessels L.
6-26-737-5
Oliel Y.
Copil M.
6-26-4
Klein L.[3]
Damm M.
6-44-67-5
Mayot H.[6]
Dougaz A.
7-647-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ilkel C.
7-56-4
Yevseyev D.
Gombos N.[8]
4-66-16-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Duran T.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.
Onclin G.[5]
6-16-0
Monday J.
Zuk K.
4-66-16-4
De Jong J.[2]
Ilhan M.
6-26-736-2
Hardt N.
Kwon S.[1]
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Mansouri S.
6-36-4