Damir Dzumhur vs Dino Prizmic — Istanbul CH Quarter-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Damir Dzumhur
BIH7
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1596Hard ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
Dino Prizmic
CRO4
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
Dzumhur D.
6-3 6-7 7-5
Prizmic D.
Dzumhur D.
66372
Prizmic D.
37751

Damir Dzumhur defeated Dino Prizmic 6-3 6-7 7-5 in the Istanbul CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84.

Key context

  • Match story: Damir Dzumhur closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Prizmic D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Dzumhur D.Prizmic D.
2
Serve
34
35
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.Prizmic D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.Prizmic D.
Clutch Rating·Even
70
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
92
Break points won·Even
64
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dzumhur D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Prizmic D.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1596
Surface ELO
6.6+138 Hard Elo edge
2.8Overall Elo 1638
ELO gap
7.2Overall Elo 1841
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.Prizmic D.
Freshness·Slight edge
76
87

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d) · Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[7]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Klein L.[3]
De Jong J.[2]
7-626-727-65
Dzumhur D.[7]
Hardt N.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Hardt N.
Celikbilek A.
1-67-654-1
Klein L.[3]
Yevseyev D.
7-656-737-62
Dzumhur D.[7]
Prizmic D.[4]
6-36-737-5
De Jong J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
R16
Hardt N.
Tomic B.
6-23-67-66
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Mayot H.[6]
6-716-36-3
Klein L.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Prizmic D.[4]
Bicknell B.
4-66-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Kirci K.
6-27-64
Celikbilek A.
Oliel Y.
2-66-46-3
De Jong J.[2]
Monday J.
7-56-1
Dzumhur D.[7]
Erel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Erel Y.
Cukierman D.
6-21-0
Kirci K.
Borg L.
6-13-66-3
Bicknell B.
Martineau M.
6-757-636-3
Kirkin E.
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Prizmic D.[4]
Wessels L.
6-26-737-5
Oliel Y.
Copil M.
6-26-4
Klein L.[3]
Damm M.
6-44-67-5
Mayot H.[6]
Dougaz A.
7-647-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Ilkel C.
7-56-4
Yevseyev D.
Gombos N.[8]
4-66-16-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Duran T.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.
Onclin G.[5]
6-16-0
Monday J.
Zuk K.
4-66-16-4
De Jong J.[2]
Ilhan M.
6-26-736-2
Hardt N.
Kwon S.[1]
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Mansouri S.
6-36-4