Nam Hoang Ly vs Nick Chappell — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Ly N.
5-7 6-4 6-0
Chappell N.
Ly N.
5662
Chappell N.
7401

Nam Hoang Ly defeated Nick Chappell 5-7 6-4 6-0 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ly N.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ly N.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ly N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
1.4
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
8.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[1]
Watanuki Y.[2]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[1]
Tu L.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[2]
Shang J.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Shang J.[4]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Bai Y.
6-06-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-0
Tu L.
Bellier A.
7-666-2
R16
Oconnell C.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-1
Tu L.
Peliwo F.
7-656-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-1
Ly N.
Wu T.[5]
3-66-16-2
Giustino L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-16-4
Bellier A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-653-66-4
Bai Y.
Palan D.
6-36-2
Shang J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-3
R32
Watanuki Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Mu T.
6-34-67-5
Wu T.[5]
Sun F.
7-653-66-2
Bellier A.
Kadhe A.
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Te R.
6-26-4
Atmane T.[7]
Jasika O.
6-37-61
Tu L.
Sekulic P.
6-16-0
Palan D.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-26-4
Uchiyama Y.
Liu H.
6-17-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Haliak M.
Ayeni O.
6-23-66-3
Sweeny D.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Peliwo F.
Polmans M.[3]
6-16-3
Shang J.[4]
Strombachs R.
6-47-64
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-46-0