Li Tu vs Antoine Bellier — Shanghai CH Quarter-final

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
SUI
Antoine Bellier
29 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Tu L.
7-6 6-2
Bellier A.
Tu L.
7862
Bellier A.
6620

Li Tu defeated Antoine Bellier 7-6 6-2 in the Shanghai CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Bellier A.

Bellier A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Bellier A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
30%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
11.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Bellier A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
89
Break points won·Slight edge
8
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bellier A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[1]
Watanuki Y.[2]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[1]
Tu L.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[2]
Shang J.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Shang J.[4]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Bai Y.
6-06-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-0
Tu L.
Bellier A.
7-666-2
R16
Oconnell C.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-1
Tu L.
Peliwo F.
7-656-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-1
Ly N.
Wu T.[5]
3-66-16-2
Giustino L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-16-4
Bellier A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-653-66-4
Bai Y.
Palan D.
6-36-2
Shang J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-3
R32
Watanuki Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Mu T.
6-34-67-5
Wu T.[5]
Sun F.
7-653-66-2
Bellier A.
Kadhe A.
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Te R.
6-26-4
Atmane T.[7]
Jasika O.
6-37-61
Tu L.
Sekulic P.
6-16-0
Palan D.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-26-4
Uchiyama Y.
Liu H.
6-17-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Haliak M.
Ayeni O.
6-23-66-3
Sweeny D.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Peliwo F.
Polmans M.[3]
6-16-3
Shang J.[4]
Strombachs R.
6-47-64
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-46-0