Lukas Rosol vs Mirza Basic — Tulln CH Qualifying Round 2

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
CZE3
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
clay
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Rosol L.
7-6 6-2
Basic M.
Rosol L.
7762
Basic M.
6320

Lukas Rosol defeated Mirza Basic 7-6 6-2 in the Tulln CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lukas Rosol extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-10-14ViennaR16hardLukas Rosol6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Basic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Basic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
33
Break points saved·Dominant
89
56
Break points won·Even
3
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
73
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
7.0
0.0Lost last 12
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
Rosol L.[3]
Basic M.
7-636-2
Hassan B.[1]
Forejtek J.
5-77-657-5
Jahn J.[9]
Kasnikowski M.[2]
6-16-4
Melzer G.
Rola B.[6]
6-46-4
Moeller M.[5]
Moraing M.
6-727-56-4
Masur D.[4]
Pichler D.
6-26-746-4
Q1
Rola B.[6]
Prihodko O.
6-36-2
Pichler D.
Kivattsev K.[8]
7-634-66-3
Rosol L.[3]
Milev Y.
6-46-1
Moraing M.
Chepelev A.[7]
6-26-0
Masur D.[4]
Gaxherri S.
6-26-1
Melzer G.
Compagnucci T.[10]
7-643-66-3
Forejtek J.
Klok D.[12]
6-16-2
Kasnikowski M.[2]
Werren P.
6-16-3
Moeller M.[5]
Setkic A.
6-33-66-2
Hassan B.[1]
Ujvary M.
6-46-4
Basic M.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.[11]
6-757-627-63
Jahn J.[9]
Wehnelt K.
6-46-4