Christopher Oconnell vs Yan Bai — Shanghai CH Quarter-final

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS1
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 September 2023
hard
CHN
Yan Bai
#1489ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Oconnell C.
6-0 6-2
Bai Y.
Oconnell C.
662
Bai Y.
020

Christopher Oconnell defeated Yan Bai 6-0 6-2 in the Shanghai CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bai Y.

Bai Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Bai Y.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Bai Y.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Bai Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
18
Break points saved·Dominant
98
23
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bai Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[1]
Watanuki Y.[2]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[1]
Tu L.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[2]
Shang J.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Shang J.[4]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Bai Y.
6-06-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-0
Tu L.
Bellier A.
7-666-2
R16
Oconnell C.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
7-634-1
Tu L.
Peliwo F.
7-656-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-1
Ly N.
Wu T.[5]
3-66-16-2
Giustino L.
Yunchaokete B.[6]
6-16-4
Bellier A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-653-66-4
Bai Y.
Palan D.
6-36-2
Shang J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-3
R32
Watanuki Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Mu T.
6-34-67-5
Wu T.[5]
Sun F.
7-653-66-2
Bellier A.
Kadhe A.
6-47-5
Giustino L.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Yunchaokete B.[6]
Te R.
6-26-4
Atmane T.[7]
Jasika O.
6-37-61
Tu L.
Sekulic P.
6-16-0
Palan D.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-26-4
Uchiyama Y.
Liu H.
6-17-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Saville L.
6-46-0
Haliak M.
Ayeni O.
6-23-66-3
Sweeny D.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Peliwo F.
Polmans M.[3]
6-16-3
Shang J.[4]
Strombachs R.
6-47-64
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-46-0