Sumit Nagal vs Zsombor Piros — Como CH Round of 16

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 August 2023
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN2
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Nagal S.
6-3 6-4
Piros Z.
Nagal S.
662
Piros Z.
340

Sumit Nagal defeated Zsombor Piros 6-3 6-4 in the Como CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
84
Break points won·Even
35
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1538
Surface ELO
7.3+83 Clay Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1661
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Piros Z.
Freshness·Dominant
96
54

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Martinez P.[5]
5-76-26-3
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Paire B.[4]
7-56-3
Martinez P.[5]
Napolitano S.
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[5]
Nagal S.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.
Darderi L.
6-32-66-3
Paire B.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-46-3
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Molleker R.
6-16-3
R16
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[7]
7-53-0
Kuzmanov D.
Gakhov I.[8]
6-22-0
Paire B.[4]
Carboni L.
5-76-23-0
Molleker R.
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Darderi L.
Bourgue M.
7-626-2
Nagal S.
Piros Z.[2]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Martinez P.[5]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-47-64
R32
Piros Z.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Martinez P.[5]
Lavagno E.
6-06-1
Bourgue M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-1
Napolitano S.
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Gakhov I.[8]
Martin A.
6-46-1
Molleker R.
Cobolli F.[6]
6-36-3
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Agamenone F.
6-36-4
Paire B.[4]
Hemery C.
6-16-0
Neumayer L.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-35-76-3
Darderi L.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-36-2
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Royer V.
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Bonadio R.
6-40-67-64
Giannessi A.
Sels J.
6-26-2
Carboni L.
Fatic N.
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.
Zekic M.
6-26-3
Fognini F.[7]
Campana Lee G.
3-66-46-0