Jose Rubin Statham vs Hanwen Li — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 32

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NZL
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 August 2023
hard
CHN
Hanwen Li
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Statham J.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Li H.
Statham J.
63772
Li H.
36621

Jose Rubin Statham defeated Hanwen Li 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Statham J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Li H.

Li H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Serve advantage — Statham J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Statham J.Li H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
62%
49%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
56%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Statham J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Li H.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
7.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Haliak M.
Mccabe J.[8]
6-23-2
Atmane T.[2]
Berankis R.[7]
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mccabe J.[8]
Te R.
7-663-66-0
Berankis R.[7]
Sinclair C.
7-56-746-1
Atmane T.[2]
Tu L.[5]
6-37-5
Haliak M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
R16
Berankis R.[7]
Strombachs R.
6-46-2
Te R.
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Haliak M.
Xiao L.
6-46-1
Atmane T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-13-66-2
Tu L.[5]
Statham J.
6-26-2
Takahashi Y.
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-1
Mccabe J.[8]
Giustino L.
6-43-66-1
Sinclair C.
Ly N.
6-31-66-1
R32
Mccabe J.[8]
Saville L.
7-632-66-3
Tu L.[5]
Sekulic P.
6-36-4
Te R.
Yunchaokete B.[1]
6-776-37-66
Sakellaridis S.
Zhu E.
7-57-66
Ayeni O.
Weber A.
6-26-2
Sinclair C.
Uchida K.[3]
6-33-66-4
Strombachs R.
Liu H.
6-43-66-3
Berankis R.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Takahashi Y.
Cui J.
6-26-2
Haliak M.
Mukund S.
6-37-5
Xiao L.
Noguchi R.[4]
6-34-66-2
Giustino L.
Sheyngezikht L.
6-46-1
Statham J.
Li H.
6-33-67-62
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-36-2
Peliwo F.
Palan D.
6-23-66-2
Atmane T.[2]
Sun F.
4-67-617-69