Sumit Nagal vs Riccardo Bonadio — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 August 2023
clay
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Nagal S.
6-4 0-6 7-6
Bonadio R.
Nagal S.
60772
Bonadio R.
46641

Sumit Nagal defeated Riccardo Bonadio 6-4 0-6 7-6 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Riccardo Bonadio came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 6–4 0–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Bonadio R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Bonadio R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Bonadio R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
26
Break points saved·Even
69
70
Break points won·Clear edge
35
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bonadio R.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Bonadio R.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Martinez P.[5]
5-76-26-3
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Paire B.[4]
7-56-3
Martinez P.[5]
Napolitano S.
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[5]
Nagal S.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.
Darderi L.
6-32-66-3
Paire B.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-46-3
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Molleker R.
6-16-3
R16
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[7]
7-53-0
Kuzmanov D.
Gakhov I.[8]
6-22-0
Paire B.[4]
Carboni L.
5-76-23-0
Molleker R.
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Darderi L.
Bourgue M.
7-626-2
Nagal S.
Piros Z.[2]
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Martinez P.[5]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-47-64
R32
Piros Z.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Martinez P.[5]
Lavagno E.
6-06-1
Bourgue M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-1
Napolitano S.
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Gakhov I.[8]
Martin A.
6-46-1
Molleker R.
Cobolli F.[6]
6-36-3
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
Agamenone F.
6-36-4
Paire B.[4]
Hemery C.
6-16-0
Neumayer L.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-35-76-3
Darderi L.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-36-2
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Royer V.
3-66-36-4
Nagal S.
Bonadio R.
6-40-67-64
Giannessi A.
Sels J.
6-26-2
Carboni L.
Fatic N.
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.
Zekic M.
6-26-3
Fognini F.[7]
Campana Lee G.
3-66-46-0