Ricardas Berankis vs Colin Sinclair — Zhangjiagang CH Quarter-final

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
LTU7
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 August 2023
hard
NMI
Colin Sinclair
#513ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLWL
Berankis R.
7-5 6-7 6-1
Sinclair C.
Berankis R.
76462
Sinclair C.
57711

Ricardas Berankis defeated Colin Sinclair 7-5 6-7 6-1 in the Zhangjiagang CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ricardas Berankis came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Berankis R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sinclair C.

Sinclair C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Berankis R.Sinclair C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
7.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Berankis R.Sinclair C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
75
Break points won·Slight edge
16
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Berankis R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sinclair C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
8.5
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Haliak M.
Mccabe J.[8]
6-23-2
Atmane T.[2]
Berankis R.[7]
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mccabe J.[8]
Te R.
7-663-66-0
Berankis R.[7]
Sinclair C.
7-56-746-1
Atmane T.[2]
Tu L.[5]
6-37-5
Haliak M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
R16
Berankis R.[7]
Strombachs R.
6-46-2
Te R.
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Haliak M.
Xiao L.
6-46-1
Atmane T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-13-66-2
Tu L.[5]
Statham J.
6-26-2
Takahashi Y.
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-1
Mccabe J.[8]
Giustino L.
6-43-66-1
Sinclair C.
Ly N.
6-31-66-1
R32
Mccabe J.[8]
Saville L.
7-632-66-3
Tu L.[5]
Sekulic P.
6-36-4
Te R.
Yunchaokete B.[1]
6-776-37-66
Sakellaridis S.
Zhu E.
7-57-66
Ayeni O.
Weber A.
6-26-2
Sinclair C.
Uchida K.[3]
6-33-66-4
Strombachs R.
Liu H.
6-43-66-3
Berankis R.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Takahashi Y.
Cui J.
6-26-2
Haliak M.
Mukund S.
6-37-5
Xiao L.
Noguchi R.[4]
6-34-66-2
Giustino L.
Sheyngezikht L.
6-46-1
Statham J.
Li H.
6-33-67-62
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-36-2
Peliwo F.
Palan D.
6-23-66-2
Atmane T.[2]
Sun F.
4-67-617-69