Terence Atmane vs Fajing Sun — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 32

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Terence Atmane
FRA2
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 August 2023
hard
CHN
Fajing Sun
#273ATP
1496ELO
1473Hard ELO
$32kYTD
$490kCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Atmane T.
4-6 7-6 7-6
Sun F.
Atmane T.
4777112
Sun F.
661691

Terence Atmane defeated Fajing Sun 4-6 7-6 7-6 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Terence Atmane extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-25BeijingQ1hardTerence Atmane6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sun F.

Sun F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Sun F.
36
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Sun F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Sun F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
5
Break points saved·Dominant
95
65
Break points won·Clear edge
25
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Sun F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+200 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1473
7.7Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1496
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Sun F.
Freshness·Even
96
95

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sun F.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[2]
Haliak M.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Haliak M.
Mccabe J.[8]
6-23-2
Atmane T.[2]
Berankis R.[7]
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mccabe J.[8]
Te R.
7-663-66-0
Berankis R.[7]
Sinclair C.
7-56-746-1
Atmane T.[2]
Tu L.[5]
6-37-5
Haliak M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
R16
Berankis R.[7]
Strombachs R.
6-46-2
Te R.
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Haliak M.
Xiao L.
6-46-1
Atmane T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-13-66-2
Tu L.[5]
Statham J.
6-26-2
Takahashi Y.
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-1
Mccabe J.[8]
Giustino L.
6-43-66-1
Sinclair C.
Ly N.
6-31-66-1
R32
Mccabe J.[8]
Saville L.
7-632-66-3
Tu L.[5]
Sekulic P.
6-36-4
Te R.
Yunchaokete B.[1]
6-776-37-66
Sakellaridis S.
Zhu E.
7-57-66
Ayeni O.
Weber A.
6-26-2
Sinclair C.
Uchida K.[3]
6-33-66-4
Strombachs R.
Liu H.
6-43-66-3
Berankis R.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Takahashi Y.
Cui J.
6-26-2
Haliak M.
Mukund S.
6-37-5
Xiao L.
Noguchi R.[4]
6-34-66-2
Giustino L.
Sheyngezikht L.
6-46-1
Statham J.
Li H.
6-33-67-62
Ly N.
Chappell N.
5-76-36-2
Peliwo F.
Palan D.
6-23-66-2
Atmane T.[2]
Sun F.
4-67-617-69