Brandon Nakashima vs Jason Kubler — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
hard
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Nakashima B.
6-1 3-6 7-6
Kubler J.
Nakashima B.
63772
Kubler J.
16631

Brandon Nakashima defeated Jason Kubler 6-1 3-6 7-6 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Nakashima came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Kubler J.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.5
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
90
Break points won·Dominant
13
46
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kubler J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+152 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1635
6.6Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Kubler J.
Freshness·
88
—

Nakashima B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[6]
Lehecka J.[5]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.[5]
Korda S.[3]
W/O
Baez S.[6]
Coric B.[1]
6-36-747-62
Quarter-finals
Coric B.[1]
Cerundolo J.
6-36-1
Baez S.[6]
Djere L.[4]
6-36-0
Korda S.[3]
Gasquet R.[12]
4-66-17-67
Lehecka J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-646-4
R16
Purcell M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
7-647-62
Cerundolo J.
Kumar O.
7-56-3
Gasquet R.[12]
Nakashima B.
2-66-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Michelsen A.
6-46-4
Baez S.[6]
Vukic A.[9]
6-44-66-4
Coric B.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-46-736-3
Korda S.[3]
Fucsovics M.[14]
7-656-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Koepfer D.
6-33-66-4
R32
Vukic A.[9]
Van Assche L.
6-36-756-3
Baez S.[6]
Galan D.
3-66-46-4
Korda S.[3]
Bonzi B.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Krueger M.
2-66-26-3
Coric B.[1]
Hijikata R.
6-27-62
Gasquet R.[12]
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[2]
Draper J.
7-680-0
Cerundolo J.
Hanfmann Y.[10]
7-635-77-64
Nakashima B.
Fils A.[7]
6-757-656-2
Fucsovics M.[14]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Purcell M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Giron M.[13]
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
6-37-5
Michelsen A.
Ofner S.[15]
7-647-5
Djere L.[4]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-3
Koepfer D.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-2
R64
Hijikata R.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-2
Mmoh M.
King D.
6-23-66-3
Michelsen A.
Varillas J.
6-36-736-0
Nakashima B.
Kubler J.
6-13-67-63
Zhang Z.
Ivashka I.
4-67-676-2
Bonzi B.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Koepfer D.
Lestienne C.
6-43-67-68
Draper J.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Kumar O.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Huesler M.
Shevchenko A.
6-34-64-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Halys Q.
4-66-26-4
Krueger M.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Van Assche L.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-36-2
Galan D.
Albot R.
6-17-5
Cerundolo J.
Safiullin R.
7-653-66-3
Purcell M.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-1