Michael Vrbensky vs Jaime Faria — Prague CH Qualifying Round 2

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Michael Vrbensky
CZE1
Michael Vrbensky
#744ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
POR9
Jaime Faria
#92ATP
1735ELO
1706Clay ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
Vrbensky M.
6-3 6-4
Faria J.
Vrbensky M.
662
Faria J.
340

Michael Vrbensky defeated Jaime Faria 6-3 6-4 in the Prague CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jaime Faria came in ranked #92.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vrbensky M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Faria J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Vrbensky M.

Serve advantage — Faria J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vrbensky M.Faria J.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (132 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vrbensky M.Faria J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
52
76
Break points won·Slight edge
11
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vrbensky M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Faria J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vrbensky M.Faria J.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
90

Vrbensky M.: 15 days rest · Faria J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[8]
Houkes M.
4-66-47-5
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Moro Canas A.[12]
6-26-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Hrazdil J.
7-626-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Domingues J.
6-33-66-3
Gaio F.
Laaksonen H.[4]
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[1]
Molleker R.
6-06-3
Andreozzi G.[6]
Rybakov A.[11]
6-36-3
Harris B.[8]
Damm M.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Stodder T.[9]
7-666-2
Rincon D.[5]
Artnak B.
6-26-2
Elias G.[10]
Prihodko O.
7-646-3
Molleker R.[7]
Sachko V.[1]
6-46-2
Kivattsev K.[8]
Filip J.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.[5]
6-26-3
Gomez F.[4]
Damas M.
6-26-2
Debru G.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-16-0
Cias P.
Donski A.
7-617-67
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
Vrbensky M.[1]
Faria J.[9]
6-36-4
Q1
Laaksonen H.[4]
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Squire H.
6-26-3
Domingues J.
Gengel M.[10]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-3
Molleker R.
Lazarov A.[11]
7-54-67-65
Houkes M.
Mochizuki S.[5]
7-636-3
Moro Canas A.[12]
Barnat J.
7-57-5
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Rosol L.
2-66-36-4
Hrazdil J.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-4
Gaio F.
Yevseyev D.[9]
6-06-756-3
Choinski J.[1]
Harris B.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Andreozzi G.[6]
Manafov V.
6-26-4
Rybakov A.[11]
Rikl P.
7-657-5
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.[2]
6-36-2
Stodder T.[9]
Filip J.
3-66-46-4
Harris B.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Gengel M.[3]
6-26-0
Artnak B.
Paulson A.[12]
4-66-36-4
Rincon D.[5]
Brunclik P.
6-16-767-63
Elias G.[10]
Bolardt A.
6-27-5
Molleker R.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[1]
Haerteis J.
5-76-26-1
Prihodko O.
Domingues J.[4]
6-45-76-3
Nicod J.
Milev Y.[12]
4-66-16-2
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Piraino G.[7]
7-56-3
Damas M.
Butvilas E.[11]
6-46-4
Filip J.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-36-3
Kivattsev K.[8]
Barnat J.
6-46-1
Donski A.
Potenza L.[10]
6-26-3
Cias P.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-44-66-4
Faria J.[9]
Siniakov D.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Milev Y.
4-66-16-2
Debru G.[3]
Metreveli A.
6-27-5
Vrbensky M.[1]
Kielan S.
6-26-4