Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Pedro Boscardin Dias — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
PAR
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
#71ATP
1740ELO
1708Clay ELO
$396kYTD
$653kCAREER
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
BRA
Pedro Boscardin Dias
#260ATP
1481ELO
1460Clay ELO
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Vallejo A.
6-2 6-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Vallejo A.
662
Boscardin Dias P.
240

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo defeated Pedro Boscardin Dias 6-2 6-4 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Adolfo Daniel Vallejo came in ranked #71.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vallejo A.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Boscardin Dias P.

Boscardin Dias P.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Vallejo A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vallejo A.Boscardin Dias P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (174 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vallejo A.Boscardin Dias P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
28
Break points saved·Dominant
71
25
Break points won·Dominant
65
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vallejo A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Boscardin Dias P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+249 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1460
8.2Overall Elo 1740
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1481
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vallejo A.Boscardin Dias P.
Freshness·Slight edge
91
96

Vallejo A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 32 games (7d) · Boscardin Dias P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0